Same biking brief, $0.14 versus $2.21
Hassan gave GLM 5.3 and Claude Fable 5 the same prompt: a 3D biking website. GLM nailed it for $0.14. Fable cost $2.21 and, this time, lost.
Hassan ran one prompt through two models and put them side by side. A 3D biking website. GLM 5.3 on the left, Claude Fable 5 on the right. GLM nailed it. Fable did not. The bill was $0.14 against $2.21, more than fifteen times cheaper for the one that worked.
A single comparison is not a leaderboard. It is a receipt for one brief, on one day, with the outputs visible. That is more useful than a benchmark table, because a biking site is something you can watch fail: the road, the bike, the scroll, the sense that a page was designed.
The interesting number is the small one. A model that costs cents can win a taste test against a model that costs dollars, and the clip is the only way to believe which side won.
Made with
Hassan
@nutlope
This model is insane at 3D website design. I asked GLM 5.3 (left) & Fable 5 (right) to make me a 3d biking website. GLM nailed it while Fable failed. GLM cost $0.14 while Fable cost $2.21. More than 15x cheaper while being even better in this case! https://t.co/70TYUFv90s
1K likes
- likes
- 1,002
- replies
- 46
Captured when this was curated, not live. —
